Random forests for verbal autopsy analysis: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards
© Flaxman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 14 April 2011
Accepted: 4 August 2011
Published: 4 August 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gary King|
|29 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Chandramohan|
|14 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Chandramohan|
|27 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - D. R. Mani|
|6 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|8 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - D. R. Mani|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|4 Aug 2011||Editorially accepted|
|4 Aug 2011||Article published||10.1186/1478-7954-9-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.