Assessing quality of medical death certification: Concordance between gold standard diagnosis and underlying cause of death in selected Mexican hospitals
© Hernández et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 2 April 2011
Accepted: 4 August 2011
Published: 4 August 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Kahn|
|24 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chalapati Rao|
|1 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert JAKOB|
|9 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Rafael Lozano|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Rafael Lozano|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Aug 2011||Editorially accepted|
|4 Aug 2011||Article published||10.1186/1478-7954-9-38|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.