Burden of type 2 diabetes attributed to lower educational levels in Sweden
© Agardh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 March 2011
Accepted: 16 December 2011
Published: 16 December 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anton Kunst|
|25 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marc Fleurbaey|
|29 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rasmus Hoffmann|
|21 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Agardh|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anton Kunst|
|12 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marc Fleurbaey|
|12 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rasmus Hoffmann|
|29 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Agardh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Agardh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Dec 2011||Editorially accepted|
|16 Dec 2011||Article published||10.1186/1478-7954-9-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.