The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 May 2016
Accepted: 10 January 2017
Published: 14 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Krebs-Smith|
|11 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Connie Weaver|
|14 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Euridice Martinez Steele|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Connie Weaver|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12963-017-0119-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.