Evidence-based design recommendations for prevalence studies on multimorbidity: improving comparability of estimates
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 April 2016
Accepted: 28 February 2017
Published: 7 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Abe|
|27 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Hanley|
|1 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Schindler|
|21 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Somnath Chatterji|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Holzer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12963-017-0126-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.