Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Verbal autopsy interpretation: a comparative analysis of the InterVA model versus physician review in determining causes of death in the Nairobi DSS

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary King
18 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michel Garenne
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Oti
Resubmission - Version 3
7 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Oti
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Oti
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
29 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1478-7954-8-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement