Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing community variation and randomness in public health indicators

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nayu Ikeda
23 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glen Mays
14 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Stephan Arndt
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nayu Ikeda
30 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Woolson
7 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephan Arndt
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephan Arndt
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stephan Arndt
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
2 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1478-7954-9-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement