Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations among indicators at the within-level

From: Modeling contextual effects using individual-level data and without aggregation: an illustration of multilevel factor analysis (MLFA) with collective efficacy

  

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

CLOSEKNIT

1.000

         

2

ADULTS

0.461

1.000

        

3

HELP

0.483

0.467

1.000

       

4

ALONG

0.210

0.310

0.368

1.000

      

5

SAFE

0.395

0.377

0.458

0.240

1.000

     

6

VALUES

0.153

0.093

0.165

0.321

0.141

1.000

    

7

TRUST

0.408

0.422

0.528

0.309

0.487

0.234

1.000

   

8

SKIP

0.256

0.207

0.296

0.174

0.333

0.124

0.358

1.000

  

9

GRAFFITI

0.219

0.239

0.283

0.212

0.358

0.163

0.294

0.557

1.000

 

10

DISRESPECT

0.287

0.202

0.285

0.194

0.261

0.125

0.278

0.470

0.476

1.000

  1. CLOSEKNIT = this is a close-knit neighborhood; ADULTS = there are adults that kids look up to; HELP = people here are willing to help their neighbors; ALONG = people here don’t get along with each other; SAFE = adults watch out that kids are safe; VALUES = people here do not share the same values; TRUST = people in this neighborhood can be trusted; SKIP = people would intervene if children were skipping school and hanging out on the corner; GRAFFITI = people would intervene if children were spray-painting graffiti; DISRESPECT = people would intervene if children were showing disrespect to an adult. Items 4 and 6 were reverse coded.
  2. These correlations were taken from the sample used for the multilevel exploratory factor analysis (ML-EFA).