Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlations among indicators at the between-level

From: Modeling contextual effects using individual-level data and without aggregation: an illustration of multilevel factor analysis (MLFA) with collective efficacy

  

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

CLOSEKNIT

1.000

         

2

ADULTS

0.735

1.000

        

3

HELP

0.773

0.862

1.000

       

4

ALONG

0.593

0.758

0.855

1.000

      

5

SAFE

0.749

0.853

0.897

0.902

1.000

     

6

VALUES

0.561

0.620

0.668

0.754

0.705

1.000

    

7

TRUST

0.742

0.842

0.870

0.834

0.934

0.653

1.000

   

8

SKIP

0.826

0.641

0.731

0.677

0.765

0.650

0.697

1.000

  

9

GRAFFITI

0.729

0.858

0.870

0.857

0.865

0.725

0.823

0.757

1.000

 

10

DISRESPECT

0.489

0.205

0.478

0.316

0.254

0.257

0.320

0.480

0.382

1.000

  1. CLOSEKNIT = this is a close-knit neighborhood; ADULTS = there are adults that kids look up to; HELP = people here are willing to help their neighbors; ALONG = people here don’t get along with each other; SAFE = adults watch out that kids are safe; VALUES = people here do not share the same values; TRUST = people in this neighborhood can be trusted; SKIP = people would intervene if children were skipping school and hanging out on the corner; GRAFFITI = people would intervene if children were spray-painting graffiti; DISRESPECT = people would intervene if children were showing disrespect to an adult. Items 4 and 6 were reverse coded.
  2. These correlations were taken from the sample used for the multilevel exploratory factor analysis (ML-EFA).