This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Identifying potential differences in cause-of-death coding practices across Russian regions
© Danilova et al. 2016
Received: 4 November 2015
Accepted: 15 March 2016
Published: 22 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carla Abouzahr|
|24 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Mckee|
|28 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Phillips|
|9 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Inna Danilova|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|22 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12963-016-0078-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.