Skip to main content

Table 4 Results on predictive validity – comparison of model-fit criteria for four different models

From: Development of a metric for tracking and comparing population health based on the minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health

 

Adjusted R-square

Percentage of deviance explained

AIC

Model 1 including only covariates

15.2

23.6

3362

Model 2 including covariates and the health metric

17.5

26.2

3251

Model 3 including covariates and the general health question

16.7

25.5

3285

Model 4 including covariates, the general health question and the health metric

17.9

26.6

3240

  1. For wave-4 data, four different additive logit-models predicting mortality in 2008 to 2012 are compared based on three model-fit criteria: adjusted R-square, percentage of deviance explained, and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Covariates considered in all four models include sex, age, education, income, and health conditions. To permit a fair comparison of criteria, the same subset of data with complete responses in all the variables considered over the four models was used. Where included, age and the health metric are modeled in a flexible, non-parametric way using P-splines