Advertisement
Table 2 Individual prior estimates contributing to three scenarios of the SQUEAC conjugate Bayesian analysis
| Method | Source | Barriers score | Boosters score | Calculation | Prior estimate | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple scoring | – | 45 | 33 | \( \frac{33+\left(100-45\right)}{2} \) | 56% | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Weighted scoring | Caregivers | 43 | 20 | \( \frac{20+\left(100-43\right)}{2} \) | 62% | ✓ | ||
| Weighted scoring | Program staff | 37.5 | 21 | \( \frac{21+\left(100-37.5\right)}{2} \) | 58% | ✓ | ||
| Weighted scoring | External support team | 23 | 27 | \( \frac{27+\left(100-23\right)}{2} \) | 48% | ✓ | ||
| Histogram of belief | Program staff | – | – | – | 45% | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Histogram of belief | External support team | – | – | – | 35% | ✓ | ||
| Product of program performance | Stage 1 data | – | – | 100 % × 72.5 % × 45.4 % × 86 % × 88 % × 99% | 24% | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Previous assessment | SQUEAC report 2013 | – | – | – | 84% | ✓ | ✓ |
