Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Head-to-head comparison between the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in general population health surveys

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
15 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Kind
24 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Krabbe
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - A. Simon Pickard
8 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marc Marti-Pastor
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - A. Simon Pickard
1 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Kind
16 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Marc Marti-Pastor
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
16 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12963-018-0170-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement