Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Abe|
|7 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raymond Hutubessy|
|2 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Nick Wilson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.