Peer Review reports
From: A critical re-evaluation of the regression model specification in the US D1 EQ-5D value function
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Norman |
| 9 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Oppe |
| 21 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 29 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Norman |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 11 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-10-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.