Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Barker |
| 2 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theodore Thompson |
| 18 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Wild |
| 7 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Barker |
| 4 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Wild |
| 16 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stokes |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-11-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.