Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Harrington |
| 22 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luisa Franzini |
| 9 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Webb |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 6 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Webb |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 27 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Webb |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 27 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-8-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.