Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pieter HM van Baal |
24 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - saeid shahraz |
2 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janel Hanmer |
28 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
18 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Juanita Haagsma |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
18 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
24 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-9-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.