Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gary King |
29 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Chandramohan |
14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Murray |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Chandramohan |
27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - D. R. Mani |
6 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Murray |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - D. R. Mani |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
4 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-9-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.