Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review

Author, year, country, design

Type of injury

Setting

Study sample

Instrument

Assessment

Focus of pre-injury and follow-up assessments

Analysis

Cohort

Inclusion /Exclusion

N (response); age; % men; severity

Method

Timing

Comparison groups

Alghnam, 2014, US [18] A

Motor vehicle injury vs no MVC

Medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS)

18 + y

N = 993; MVC: 18-45y 68%; 46%

No MVC: 18-45y 51%; 47%

SF-12

Questionnaires

Pre: prospective

Post: max 9 m

NR

MVC vs no MVC

Andrew, 2012, Australia [26] A

Orthopedic injury (sport/recreation)

Trauma services/Hospital (VOTOR)

18-75y

N = 317 (73%); 40y (13); 73%

ISS > 15 19%

SF-36 (v2)

Telephone interviews

Pre: 1-2w

Post: 12 m

Pre: 4w before injury

Post: NR

Type of sport/recreation

Beaupre, 2012, Canada [30] A

Hip fracture

Nursing home facilities

65 + y; Previously ambulatory nursing home residents

N = 60 (65%); 87y (8), 62–104; 30%

EQ-5D

(Telephone) Interviews

Pre: NR

Post: 3 m, 6 m, 12 m

Pre: just before injury

Post: NR

Survival status

Brussoni, 2013, Canada [31] D

General injury

Pediatric ED/hospital

0-16y

N = 232 (67%); 0-4y 33%, 5-16y 67%; 61% boys

EQ-5D (3 L, VAS)

Questionnaires (child/proxy)

Pre: 1d before injury

Post: NR

Length of hospital stay

Buecking, 2014, Germany [35] A

Hip fracture (Proximal femoral)

Hospital/Surgical fracture treatment

>60y; No ISS ≥ 16; No malignancy-related fractures

N = 350 (65%); 81y (8), 60–99; 73%

EQ-5D (3 L, VAS)

German norms

Questionnaires

Pre: at admission

Post: at discharge

Pre: before injury

Post: current status

 

Busse, 2012, Canada [32] E

Tibia fracture

Multicenter (SPRINT)

Operative fixation intramedullary nail

N = 1319; 39y (16); 74%

SF-36

Questionnaires

Pre: at the time of enrollment

Post: 2w, 12 m

Pre: before injury

Post: NR

 

Ding, 2006, US [19] A

Extremity fracture (Long bone or pelvic)

Pediatric hospital

5-15y, Hospitalized ≥1d; No TBI

N = 100 (85%); 10y (3); 66%; NISS: 8 (5)

PedsQL

Telephone interviews

Pre: soon after injury (median 9d)

Post: 3 m, 12 m

Pre: before injury

Post: post-injury

Upper/lower extremity; HRQL domains

Dvorak, 2005, Canada [33] B,C

Vertebral fracture (C1, Jefferson)

Databases

18 + y; No neurological injury; Disruption of anterior and posterior atlantal arches

N = 34 (60%); 48y (21); 68%

SF-36

Canadian norms

Questionnaire (by mail/phone)

Not reported

Pre: before injury

Post: current status

Canadian norms

Fauerbach, 1999, US [20] A

Burn injury

Burn center

Adults

N = 86; 42y (15); 78

SF-36

Questionnaire

Pre: first 73 h after admission

Post: 2 m after discharge

Pre: month before injury

Post: past month

Post Traumatic Distress (PTD) vs no PTD; HRQL domains; US norms

Gabbe, 2007, Australia [6] A

Orthopedic injury

Hospital (VOTOR)

18 + y; New orthopedic injury

N = 1839 (77%); 45y, 21–65; 60%

SF-12

Interviews/Questionnaires

Pre: in-hospital/soon after discharge

Post: NA

Pre: week before injury

Post: NA

Men vs women

Australian norms

Greenspan, 2002, US [21] A

Gunshot injury

Hospital

18-64y; <24 h after injury

N = 60 (38%); 30y (9); 92%

ISS 1–9 57%; MAIS 3 48%

SF-36

(Telephone) Interviews

Pre: in-hospital/soon after discharge

Post: 8 m after discharge

Pre: pre-injury status

Post: current status

HRQL domains;

UK norms

Griffin, 2015, UK [36] A

Hip fracture

Hospital

60 + y; operatively managed

N = 741 (83%); 80 + y 67%; 25%

EQ-5D (3 L)

(Telephone) Interviews

No response: questionnaires (post)

Pre: in-hospital/soon after discharge

Post: 4w, 4 m, 12 m

Pre: pre-injury status

Post: NR

Age

Gross, 2012, Switzerland [44]A

TBI vs no TBI

ICU

≥2 AIS regions, ISS > 16; GCS < 14, AISH > 2

No secondarily admissions

N = 170 (65%); 40y (21); 75%

ISS 28 (8); GCS 11 (5)

EQ-5D (3 L, VAS)

German norms

SF-36 (v1)

Postal questionnaires

Pre & post: 2y

Pre: pre-injury status

Post: post-injury status

TBI vs non-TBI

Hagino, 2009, Japan [37]A

Hip fracture

Vertebral fracture

Wrist fracture

Hospital

Women; 45 + y; No malignancy-related fractures; Lower-energy; Minor trauma

N = 122; Hip 76 (10), 49–91; Vertebral 73 (10), 48–91; Wrist 69 (10), 49-88

EQ-5D

Japanese norms

Questionnaires

Pre: first visit/admission

Post: 2w, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m

Pre: period before injury

Post: NR

Hip vs vertebral vs wrist

Innocenti, 2015, Italy [43] A

General injury

ED-HDU

N = 153 (51%); 54y (22); 67%

ISS 12 (9)

SF-12

Italian norms

Telephone interviews

Pre & post: 6 m after ED discharge

Pre: before injury

Post: current status

Change HRQL domains

Italian norms

Jaglal, 2000, Canada [34] E

Hip fracture

Hospital

Living independently; No cognitive impairment

N = 43; 81y (8); 19%

SF-36

(Telephone) Interviews

Pre: in-hospital

Post: 6w, 6 m after injury

Pre: before injury

Post: NR

HRQL domains

Jimenez, 2013, US [22] A

TBI

Hospital (CHAI)

<18y; discharged alive from ED

Hispanic or non-Hispanic white

N = 531 (73%); 0–9 50%; 65% boys; MAIS 1 46%

PedsQL (Spanish)

(Telephone) Interviews

Pre: soon after injury (median 37d)

Post: 3 m, 12 m, 24 m, 36 m

Pre: period before injury

Post: NR

Hispanic vs

non-Hispanic white

Lyrtzis, 2012, Greece [41] A

Ankle sprain (2nd degree)

Not reported

Injury at 1 limb; No previous ankle injury; No fracture; <24 h after injury; no analgesic

N = 78 (98%); 36y (13); 74%

SF-36

Questionnaires

Pre: day of injury

Post: 10d

Pre: before injury

Post: 10d since injury

HRQL domains

McGuine, 2014, US [23] A

Knee injury

Sports medicine center/clinic

Women; 13-23y; Injury during regular fitness or sport activities

N = 255 (91%); 17y (2), 13–23; 0%

SF-12 (v2)

Questionnaires

Pre: initial visit (median 12d)

Post: diagnosis, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m

Pre: 1w before injury

Post: since injury

US norms

Ottosson, 2007, Sweden [45] A

Musculoskeletal injury

ED

15 + y

N = 318 (39%); 39y (15); 46%

SF-36

Questionnaires

Pre: at inclusion

Post: 1 m, 6 m

Pre: week before injury

Post: NR

Swedish norms

Peterson, 2008, US [24] E

Hip fracture

Hospital

Hip fracture surgery

>65y; Not mentally impaired; Living independently

N = 105 (NR); alive – 79 (8); NR

SF-36 (v1)

Questionnaires

Pre: NR

Post: 1stw after operation

Pre: 4w before injury

Post: NR

Survival status;

HRQL domains

Pieper, 2014, US [25]

Related: [60] A

TBI vs no TBI

Pediatric ED (Self-selected sample)

5-17y; discharge <24 h

N = 40 mBTI, 40 no TBI

TBI: 12y (3); 80%; no TBI: 10y (3); 63%

PedsQL (4.0 Generic)

(Telephone) Interviews

Pre: initial contact

Post: 1 m, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m

Pre: week before injury

Post: NR

mTBI vs no TBI vs no injury; Children vs parents (proxy); HRQL domains

Ponsford, 2011,

Australia [27] A

Related: [61]

TBI vs no TBI

Hospital

18 + y; <24 h after injury

N = 123 (63%) mTBI, 100 (30%) no TBI

mTBI: 35y (13); 74%; no TBI: 35y (11); 64%

SF-36

Questionnaires

Pre: within 48 h after injury

Post: 1w, 3 m

Pre: before injury

Post: current, past 4w

mTBI vs no TBI

Pons-Villanueva, 2011, Spain [46] A

Motor vehicle injury vs no MVC

University graduates (SUN)

N = 64 MVC, 3297 no MVC (91%)

40y; 38%

SF-36

Questionnaires

Pre: prospective

Post: 4y, 8y

NR

MVC vs no MVC;

HRQL domains

Skoog, 2001, Sweden [40]

Tibia shaft fracture

Hospital

No pathologic fractures or fractures adjacent to implant

N = 64; 45y (19), 14–93; 56%

SF-36

Interviews/Questionnaires

Pre: during hospitalization

Post: 4 m, mean 13 m

Pre: before injury

Post: not reported

Swedish norms

Sugeno, 2008, Japan [38] A

Hip fracture

Hospital

No severe cognitive decline

N = 50 (44%); 77y (10); 20%

EQ-5D (3 L, VAS)

Interviews

Pre: 1/2d after admission

Post: discharge, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m after admission

NR

 

Tidermark, 2002, Sweden [39] A

Hip fracture (Falls)

ED

65 + y; Living independently

N = 90; 80y (7), 66–92; 37%

EQ-5D (3 L, VAS)

UK norms

Interviews/Questionnaires (post)

Pre: first days after injury

Post: 1w, 4 m, mean 17 m (2))

Pre: week before injury

Post: NR

Age (60–88); Gender; Fracture outcome; Survival status;

Swedish norms

Ulvik, 2008, Norway [42] A

General injury

Closed ICU (neurosurgery)

>18y

N = 210 (92%); 39y (17), 18–83; 81%

ISS (median) 25; 4-54

EQ-5D

Telephone interviews

Pre & post: 2-7y (median 4y)

Pre: before injury

Post: current status

 

Wasiak, 2014, Australia [28] A

Burn injury

Burn center

18 + y; TBSA > 10%

N = 99 (79%); 42y (2); 75%

SF-36 (v2)

Questionnaires

Pre: not reported

Post: 12 m

NR

Australian norms

Watson, 2005, Australia [29] A

Related: [7]

General injury

Hospital

18-74y; No self-inflicted injury;

No neurological deficit

N = 221 (88%); 38y; 72%

SF-36

Interviews

Pre: in hospital / 1stw

Post: 6w, 3 m, 6 m, 12 m

Pre: previous week

Post: previous week

Age; Gender; Work status; Employment; Australian norms

Wilson, 2012, New Zealand [8] A

Related: [6264]

General injury

Accident Compensation Corporation entitlement claims register

18-64y; No self-harm or sexual assault

N = 2.842; 18-34y 35%, 35-64y 47%; 61%

EQ-5D

New Zealand norms

Interviews

Pre: 3.2 m

Post: 4.6 m, 12.3 m

Pre: before injury

Post: current status

Recovery status;

New Zealand norms

  1. (Bold author names are studies of children; Studies in bold and italics prospectively measured pre-injury HRQL)
  2. Design: a Prospective cohort, b Retrospective cohort, c Cross-sectional, d Validation study, e Randomized controlled trial
  3. h hour, d day, w week, m month, y year, AIS abbreviated injury scale, ED emergency department, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, NR not reported, MVC injury due to motor-vehicle crash, Ortho orthopedic injury, TBI traumatic brain injury