Skip to main content

Table 2 Suicide ORs by cancer site in observed and simulated mortality data, and estimated bias magnitudes

From: Collider and reporting biases involved in the analyses of cause of death associations in death certificates: an illustration with cancer and suicide

Cancer site

French mortality data

Simulation #1: independence

Simulation #2: RR from Fang et al. [4]

Fang et al. study[4]

Collider biasb

Reporting biasc

OR

[95% CI]

OR

[95% CI]

OR

[95% CI]

RR

No cancera

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.0

1.0

1.0

Prostate

0.24

[0.22;0.26]

0.71

[0.68;0.75]

1.14

[1.10;1.18]

1.9

1.7

4.7

Cutaneous melanoma

0.01

[0.01;0.02]

0.61

[0.53;0.70]

0.77

[0.68;0.86]

1.4

1.8

64

Breast

0.04

[0.03;0.04]

0.58

[0.52;0.64]

0.85

[0.78;0.92]

1.6

1.9

24

Colorectal

0.05

[0.05;0.06]

0.35

[0.33;0.37]

0.50

[0.48;0.52]

1.6

3.2

9.4

Oesophageal, liver, pancreatic

0.03

[0.03;0.03]

0.17

[0.16;0.19]

0.55

[0.53;0.58]

4.5

8.1

20

Lung

0.02

[0.02;0.02]

0.14

[0.13;0.15]

0.36

[0.35;0.38]

3.3

9.1

17

Central nervous system

0.01

[0.01;0.01]

0.11

[0.09;0.14]

0.25

[0.22;0.28]

2.3

9.3

35

  1. Logistic regression models adjusted for age (B-spline of degree 3), gender, and region of death; mainland France, 2000–2010
  2. OR Odds ratio, RR Relative risk, 95% CI 95% Confidence interval
  3. aExcluding other cancer sites, multiple cancers, and haematological malignancies. The magnitude of the biases was estimated from the following ratios
  4. bCollider bias = RR from Fang et al./OR estimated from the data of simulation #2
  5. cReporting bias = OR estimated from the data of simulation #2/OR estimated from observed deaths