Skip to main content

National and subnational mortality effects of metabolic risk factors and smoking in Iran: a comparative risk assessment



Mortality from cardiovascular and other chronic diseases has increased in Iran. Our aim was to estimate the effects of smoking and high systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), and high body mass index (BMI) on mortality and life expectancy, nationally and subnationally, using representative data and comparable methods.


We used data from the Non-Communicable Disease Surveillance Survey to estimate means and standard deviations for the metabolic risk factors, nationally and by region. Lung cancer mortality was used to measure cumulative exposure to smoking. We used data from the death registration system to estimate age-, sex-, and disease-specific numbers of deaths in 2005, adjusted for incompleteness using demographic methods. We used systematic reviews and meta-analyses of epidemiologic studies to obtain the effect of risk factors on disease-specific mortality. We estimated deaths and life expectancy loss attributable to risk factors using the comparative risk assessment framework.


In 2005, high SBP was responsible for 41,000 (95% uncertainty interval: 38,000, 44,000) deaths in men and 39,000 (36,000, 42,000) deaths in women in Iran. High FPG, BMI, and TC were responsible for about one-third to one-half of deaths attributable to SBP in men and/or women. Smoking was responsible for 9,000 deaths among men and 2,000 among women. If SBP were reduced to optimal levels, life expectancy at birth would increase by 3.2 years (2.6, 3.9) and 4.1 years (3.2, 4.9) in men and women, respectively; the life expectancy gains ranged from 1.1 to 1.8 years for TC, BMI, and FPG. SBP was also responsible for the largest number of deaths in every region, with age-standardized attributable mortality ranging from 257 to 333 deaths per 100,000 adults in different regions.


Management of blood pressure through diet, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions should be a priority in Iran. Interventions for other metabolic risk factors and smoking can also improve population health.

Peer Review reports


Iran has experienced unprecedented demographic changes over the past few decades. According to the General Population and Housing Census, the number of adults older than 64 years of age increased from 1.2 million in 1976 (3.7% of the population) to 3.5 million in 2006 (5.5% of the population). Chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular diseases (CVD), have also become a more prominent cause of death, responsible for 47% of all deaths in 1995, compared with 27% in 1981 [1].

An important question for planning and allocating resources is the role of metabolic and lifestyle risk factors on mortality, especially from CVD. A previous analysis [2] estimated the mortality effects of major risk factors in Iran but was based on data that were not nationally representative. Further, the previous analysis estimated the effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP), total cholesterol (TC), and body mass index (BMI) below and above clinical thresholds, even though epidemiologic studies have shown that the association between these risk factors and CVD risk continues below such thresholds [3, 4]. Additionally, there has not been an assessment of the incompleteness of the vital registration system and misclassification of cause of death, or of uncertainty of the estimated number of deaths attributable to risk factors. Nationally and provincially representative data on risk factors are now available for 2005 from a health examination survey focused on noncommunicable diseases, and large meta-analyses of cohorts have provided new evidence on the effects of these risk factors on CVD [4, 5]. There are also new methods that help adjust for incompleteness of mortality registration [6].

We used these advances in data and methods to estimate the mortality effects of metabolic and lifestyle risk factors at the national level. To understand how risk factors may affect mortality in different parts of Iran, we extended the analysis to groups of provinces defined by geography and socioeconomic status. We also quantified the uncertainty in our results.


We conducted a population-level comparative risk assessment (CRA) for five modifiable risk factors. Based on data availability on exposure and effect size, the risk factors in the analysis were smoking and four metabolic risks: BMI, SBP, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and TC. The CRA analysis estimates the number of deaths that would have been prevented if past and current exposure to risk factors were reduced to a hypothetical alternative distribution. The inputs to the analysis are: [1] the current distribution of exposure to the risk factor in the population, [2] the etiological effect of the risk factor on disease-specific mortality, [3] an alternative exposure distribution, and [4] the total number of disease-specific deaths in the population. Analyses were done separately by sex and by the following age groups: 30-44, 45-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years.

Exposure to risk factors

Means and standard deviations (SD) for the metabolic risk factors were estimated from the 2005 Non-Communicable Disease Surveillance Survey (NCDSS), which is representative at the national and provincial level, and uses a multistage systematic clustered sampling applied to rural and urban areas of all provinces [7, 8]; the survey was implemented simultaneously in all provinces between December 2004 and February 2005 and included 89,400 individuals aged 15 to 64 years. The survey included a questionnaire and physical and laboratory measurements of weight, height, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure for all participants and FPG and lipids for 50,202 participants aged 25 to 64 years old. SBP was measured using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, with each participant measured three times in sitting position; weight was measured using a calibrated beam scale; and plasma was separated from the fasting blood sample and analyzed on the same day.

We imputed the mean and SD of metabolic risks in age groups above 65 years of age using data from 47 health examination surveys from other countries. Specifically, we estimated the linear slope between the ages of 30 and 64 by province for the NCDSS and for data from 47 health examination surveys from other countries with data for ages 65 years and older. We divided the slopes between 30 and 64 years from the latter surveys into tertiles; for each tertile, we estimated the average slope < 65 years in data pooled from all surveys, adjusting for inter-survey differences (i.e., survey-specific intercepts). For each Iranian province, the slope of each risk factor by age for ages 65 and older was taken from the tertile to which its slope below age 65 years belonged. We estimated the SD of the distribution for each risk factor for age groups above 65 years using the SD-mean relationship across all 47 health examination surveys. Following previous analyses [911] we used lung cancer mortality to measure cumulative population exposure to smoking.

One-off measurement of metabolic risk factors in health examination surveys overestimates the SD of the "usual" population exposure distribution, due to within-person variation. We estimated the usual population SD of SBP, FPG, and TC by multiplying the SD of the NCDSS sample by the dilution ratio from studies that had multiple exposure measurements [1214]. We did not adjust the SD of BMI for within-person variations in body weight, because studies with multiple BMI measurements have not found evidence for substantial within-person variability in BMI [15].

Etiologic effects of risk factors

For each risk factor-disease pair with convincing evidence of causality, relative risks (RRs) were derived from recent reviews of epidemiologic studies, summarized in the United States CRA study [10]. Previous work has shown that after accounting for study design and methodological differences, etiological effect sizes are consistent across different populations [16], and hence, in the absence of reliable evidence for etiological effects from Iran, large meta-analyses of international cohorts are the best source of etiological effect sizes.

Disease-specific mortality

Population data by age, sex, and province were from the 1996 and 2006 national censuses. Deaths by age, sex, province, and underlying cause of death were from the mortality registration system, which covers all 30 provinces but excludes Tehran city, where 13.5% of the population lives [17]. We used data from Tehran's central cemetery for Tehran city. To examine and correct the incompleteness of death registration, we used death distribution methods [6, 18]. Specifically, we evaluated three methods: Generalized Growth Balance (GGB), Synthetic Extinct Generations (SEG), and a hybrid of the two methods (GGBSEG). We chose SEG because it gave the highest correlation between the estimated adult and child mortality completeness (r SEG = 0.16, r GGB = 0.04, r GGBSEG = 0.035). We estimated child mortality and completeness of child death registration by comparing under-5 mortality estimates from the death registration system to estimates generated from the 2001 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) and the 2006 census, an approach that has been extensively used in the literature [19].

Of the 262,000 deaths in the Iranian death registration system in 2005, about 19,000 deaths (7.4%) had an unknown cause. We used data from a study in 2005 that reviewed hospital medical records by trained physicians [20] to estimate the underlying medical causes for these deaths. We applied multinomial logistic regression to data from the above study and used the regression coefficients to estimate the proportions of different diseases as underlying causes for these deaths, as a function of the decedent's age, sex, and province of residence. Age was missing for 0.7% and sex for 0.4% of deaths. We used multiple imputation using Amelia software [21] to impute missing age and sex values.

Mortality effects of risk factors

For each risk factor and for each disease causally linked with its exposure, we computed the proportional reduction in disease-specific deaths that would occur if risk factor exposure had been reduced to an alternative level, known as the population-attributable fraction (PAF). For risks measured continuously (SBP, BMI, TC, and FPG), we computed PAFs using equation 1:

P A F = x = 0 m R R ( x ) P ( x ) d x - x = 0 m R R ( x ) P ( x ) d x x = 0 m R R ( x ) P ( x ) d x

where x is the risk factor exposure level, P(x) is the actual exposure distribution, P'(x) is the alternative exposure distribution, RR(x) is the relative risk of mortality at exposure level x for that specific disease, and m is the maximum exposure level.

We used the theoretical minimum risk exposure distribution (TMRED) as the alternative exposure distribution to measure the mortality effects of all nonoptimal levels of exposure consistently and comparably across risk factors [10, 22]. Based on a previous review of epidemiological evidence, the mean (g ± SD) of the TMREDs was chosen to be 21 (± 1) kg/m2 for BMI, 115 (± 6) mmHg for SBP, 3.8 (± 0.6) mmol/L for TC, and 4.9 (± 0.3) mmol/L for FPG.

We calculated deaths, mortality rates, and loss of life expectancy attributable to each risk factor. The mortality rates were age standardized using the national Iranian population in 2005 as the reference population. Life expectancies were calculated using standard life-table methods and accounted for the effects of death rates in older ages using the Coale-Guo method [23, 24]. Life expectancy under the TMRED distribution was calculated by reducing mortality rates in each life table age group by the proportion attributable to risk factors and recalculating the life tables.

Uncertainty in estimates

We quantified the uncertainty of the number of deaths attributable to each risk factor, accounting for uncertainty due to sampling variability of the exposure data and those of other input parameters. We used a simulation approach to combine the uncertainties of exposure distributions, RRs, and disease-specific mortality in each age-sex group. Under 65 years of age, in each iteration, we used one randomly-drawn exposure mean and SD from their distributions (normal and Chi-square distributions, respectively). Above 65 years, the uncertainty of the coefficients of the age-association regression model was also added using repeated draws from their distributions. RRs for each disease were drawn from a log-normal distribution, independently from exposure draws. Each set of exposure and disease-specific RR draws was used to calculate one PAF, separately by age group and sex. We expressed the uncertainty related to incompleteness of death registration as variance of the estimated level of completeness, assuming a SD of 20% of the estimated completeness [6]. We used 1,000 draws for each of the above parameters in repeated calculations, and reported 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) based on the resulting distributions of 1,000 estimated attributable deaths. The above analysis does not include the uncertainty associated with the basic assumptions regarding the extrapolation of age patterns and RRs across populations.

Subnational analysis

We conducted analyses by province and also by four regions. The regions were defined based on a combination of geography and socioeconomic status (SES). SES was measured using an index constructed from variables from the 2006 census, including years of schooling, employment rates, and family assets [25]. We combined these characteristics using principal component analysis and used these principal components in combination with geography to divide the country into four large regions (Figure 1). The Southeast region has the lowest SES and the Central region the highest.

Figure 1

Geographic regions used in the analysis.

All analyses were done using R version 2.11.1.


Mortality and life expectancy in Iran

After correcting for incompleteness, there were an estimated 352,000 deaths in Iran in 2005. Of these, 277,000 deaths occurred in adults 30 years of age or older (59% in men). 53% of deaths above age 30 were due to CVD, including 26% from ischemic heart disease (IHD), 13% from stroke, 4% from hypertensive diseases, and 10% from other CVD. Life expectancy at birth in Iran was 70.0 years for men, ranging from 68.2 years in the Western region to 70.5 years in the Southeast; for women, it was 74.6 years and ranged from 73.5 years in the Western region to 75.6 years in the Southeast.

Risk factor exposure

Estimated mean SBP was similar between men (126.7 mmHg; 95% UI: 126.5, 127.9) and women (126.2 mmHg; 126.0, 126.5) (Figure 2). Women had higher BMI (27.5 kg/m2; 27.5, 27.6), FPG (5.60 mmol/L; 5.56, 5.64), and TC (5.37 mmol/L; 5.35, 5.38) than men, while men had a higher prevalence of smoking (34.7%; 34.0, 35.4) than women (6.7%; 6.4, 7.0) at the national level (Figure 2). Age-standardized mean BMI and TC for both sexes and SBP for women in Iran were higher than the mean global level [2628].

Figure 2

Prevalence of smoking and mean levels of other risk factors in 2005, by region and sex. All figures are age-standardized to the 2005 national population.

The differences across regions in SBP were not statistically significant, although SBP tended to be lowest in the Central region and highest in the North-Northeast region. The Central region, with the highest SES, had the highest FPG (5.61 mmol/L; 5.53, 5.68). The Southeast region, with the lowest SES, had the highest prevalence of smoking (36.1% for men and 16.4% for women) but the lowest BMI (23.1 kg/m2 for men and 24.7 kg/m2 for women).

Mortality effects of risk factors

SBP was the leading risk factor for cardiovascular mortality, causing 41,000 deaths (38,000, 44,000) among men and 39,000 deaths (36,000, 42,000) among women (Table 1). If SBP is lowered to its optimal distribution, life expectancy at birth would increase by 3.2 years (2.6, 3.9) in men and 4.1 years (3.2, 4.9) in women (Figure 3). The age-standardized mortality attributable to SBP ranged from 257 to 333 deaths per 100,000 adults among men and women in different regions. TC and FPG had the second-largest effect on mortality among men, each causing 17,000 to 18,000 deaths, less than half of the deaths due to increased SBP. Among women, SBP was followed by FPG and BMI, each responsible for about 17,000 deaths. Life expectancy effects for FPG, BMI, and TC ranged from 1.1 to 1.8 years in both sexes. Smoking had the smallest mortality effects for both men (9,000 deaths, about one-fifth of the number attributable to SBP) and women (2,000 deaths, < 5% of the number attributable to SBP).

Table 1 Number of deaths attributable to each risk factor in 2005, by region and sex
Figure 3

Effects of each risk factor on life expectancy at birth in 2005, by region and sex.

The PAFs for the effects of all four metabolic risk factors on IHD and stroke were larger in women than men, due to higher exposure. However, deaths attributable to these risks were larger among men, due to the larger number of CVD deaths. Reducing these risk factors to their optimal levels would have led to gains in life expectancy that were nonsignificantly larger in women, possibly due to larger PAFs and differences in distributions of deaths by age and competing causes.

High SBP was the leading cause of mortality in all regions. Age-standardized mortality rates attributable to SBP were highest in the North-Northeast and Western regions, ranging from 310 to 330 deaths per 100,000 adults for both sexes; they were lowest in the Southeast in both sexes, because the age-standardized cause-specific mortality rate from CVD is lowest in this region (Figure 4). The North-Northeast and Western regions also had the largest PAF for the effects of SBP on IHD and stroke, ranging from 45% to 63% (detailed results not shown). However, the effects of SBP on life expectancy were largest in the Southeast (3.8 years gained in men and 5.5 years gained in women), possibly because CVD deaths occur in younger ages in this region.

Figure 4

Age-standardized mortality rates attributable to each risk factor in 2005, by region and sex.

Although the Southeast had the highest reported prevalence of current smoking, age-standardized mortality attributable to smoking, calculated using lung cancer mortality as indicator of cumulative exposure, was largest in the Central region among women (21 deaths per 100,000; 20, 22) and the Western region among men (75 deaths per 100,000; 74, 76). The differences may be due to longer history of smoking in the Central and Western regions, as well as higher age-specific mortality rates from diseases caused by smoking.

The highest provincial age-standardized mortality rate attributable to SBP was about 70% larger than the lowest one (the difference was about 150 deaths per 100,000). For BMI, FPG, and TC, the highest attributable mortality rate was 1.2 to 2.2 times that of the lowest. For smoking, the highest attributable mortality rate was 12 times higher in women and 32 times higher in men than that of the lowest.


Our results indicate that high SBP had the single largest mortality impact nationally, as well as in every province and region in Iran, causing an estimated 80,000 annual deaths in 2005. If SBP were reduced to optimal levels, life expectancy at birth would increase by 3.2 years (2.6, 3.9) and 4.1 years (3.2, 4.9) in men and women, respectively. High FPG, BMI, and TC were responsible for about one-third to one-half of deaths attributable to SBP in men and/or women. The effects of smoking on life expectancy at the national and subnational levels were less than one year, primarily because the rise in smoking is a more recent phenomenon in Iran than in Western countries and even East Asia.

Our analysis extends the emerging body of research on national and subnational CRA analyses [10, 2931]. The strengths of our study include combining national and subnational analyses using representative data, using effect sizes from large meta-analyses, estimating incompleteness of death registration using rigorous demographic methods, redistributing deaths with unknown causes, and quantification of uncertainty.

A key limitation of our study is that we did not have data on dietary factors, physical activity, alcohol and illicit drug use, or other metabolic risk factors, e.g., lipoproteins. Moreover, our exposure data did not include people 65 years of age and older, requiring extrapolation and leading to additional modeling assumptions and uncertainty beyond the quantified statistical uncertainty. In 2005, 5.5% of Iran's population and 49% of deaths were in those aged 65 years and older. We used RRs in specific cohorts and their meta-analyses. While this extrapolation adds a source of unquantifiable uncertainty, population-level estimation is indispensable to inform policymaking. More importantly, there is empirical evidence to support the proposition that proportional effects are similar across populations, e.g., Western and Asian populations [12, 32, 33]. Despite these limitations, our analysis, and those of others [10, 2931] demonstrate the value of nationally and subnationally representative data on risk factors for policy formulation and planning.

Our results have a number of implications for national and subnational health policies and programs in Iran, as well as for other middle-income countries. First, our analysis highlights the importance and the need for periodic risk factor surveillance studies to measure trends, which may be used for evaluating implemented policies. Recent comprehensive systematic reviews of metabolic risk factors showed that developing countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, Middle East and North Africa, Central and Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa had limited data, especially longitudinal data, on metabolic risk factors [2628, 34]. Our study supports the value of population-based surveillance for not only comparative cross-country analysis, but also for national and subnational priority setting. The demographic and epidemiologic transitions in Iran and other middle-income countries, which inevitably lead to aging of the population, make it essential to increase the participation of the elderly in health examination surveys. Future surveys should also include important dietary and lifestyle risk factors that were not included in our analysis.

Beyond risk factor surveillance, interventions are needed to address metabolic risk factors. Many countries have successfully lowered blood pressure levels in the past three decades; for example, blood pressure decreased by about 2.0 to 4.0 mmHg per decade in western European countries and Australia [28]. Although Iran has a hypertension control program, it only focuses on high-risk patients [35]. Our results indicate that a greater emphasis on reducing blood pressure at the population level through improved detection and better treatment in primary care is needed to reduce CVD mortality. Further, population-level analyses of trends and meta-analyses of randomized trials have shown that lowering salt intake can lower blood pressure [36, 37]. Since the traditional Iranian diet is wheat-based [38], reducing salt in bread through regulation or large-scale media campaigns may help lower blood pressure at the population level.

There is currently no comprehensive program to control obesity in Iran, either in the primary health care system or through lifestyle and dietary interventions, although diabetes management has been integrated in the primary care system in rural areas [39]. Community-based interventions such as family-oriented advice on healthy eating and physical activity by a dietitian have been shown to increase physical activity, improve dietary habits, and reduce weight gain [40]. Integrating obesity and diabetes prevention and control programs in the primary health care system and using community health workers might help increase compliance and reduce these risk factors, as has been done for diabetes in rural areas [39]. Identifying, implementing, and evaluating such interventions are particularly important in the light of rising overweight and obesity in Iran and worldwide [27], which would inevitably lead to an increase in diabetes and hypertension unless population-based interventions are implemented.


  1. 1.

    Sarraf-Zadegan N, Boshtam M, Malekafzali H, Bashardoost N, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Rafiei M, et al.: Secular trends in cardiovascular mortality in Iran, with special reference to Isfahan. Acta Cardiol 1999,54(6):327-33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Naghavi M, Abolhassani F, Moradi Lakeh M, Jafari N, Vaseghi S, Kazemeini H, et al.: National burden of dieases, injuries, and risk factors and disability adjusted life expectancy in Islamic Republic of Iran in 2003. 1st edition. Tehran: Ministry of Health; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R: Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002,360(9349):1903-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J, et al.: Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet 2007,370(9602):1829-39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J, et al.: Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 2009,373(9669):1083-96. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Levin-Rector A, Chalupka AN, Wang H, Dwyer L, et al.: Worldwide mortality in men and women aged 15-59 years from 1970 to 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2010,375(9727):1704-20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60517-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Janghorbani M, Amini M, Gouya MM, Delavari AR, Alikhani S, Mahdavi A: Nationwide survey of prevalence and risk factors of prehypertension and hypertension in Iranian adults. J Hypertens 2008,26(3):419-26. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f2d34d

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Esteghamati A, Abbasi M, Alikhani S, Gouya MM, Delavari A, Shishehbor MH, et al.: Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and risk factors associated with hypertension in the Iranian population: the national survey of risk factors for noncommunicable diseases of Iran. Am J Hypertens 2008,21(6):620-6. 10.1038/ajh.2008.154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, Thun M, Heath CJ: Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. Lancet 1992,339(8804):1268-78. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91600-D

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, Murray CJ, et al.: The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS medicine 2009,6(4):e1000058. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ezzati M, Lopez AD: Measuring the accumulated hazards of smoking: global and regional estimates for 2000. Tob Control 2003,12(1):79-85. 10.1136/tc.12.1.79

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lawes CM, Parag V, Bennett DA, Suh I, Lam TH, Whitlock G, et al.: Blood glucose and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. Diabetes Care 2004,27(12):2836-42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Law MR, Wald NJ, Wu T, Hackshaw A, Bailey A: Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA study. BMJ 1994,308(6925):363-6. 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.363

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al.: Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990,335(8692):765-74. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90878-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Emberson JR, Whincup PH, Morris RW, Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG: Lifestyle and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged British men: the effect of adjusting for within-person variation. Eur Heart J 2005,26(17):1774-82. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mente A, Yusuf S, Islam S, McQueen MJ, Tanomsup S, Onen CL, et al.: Metabolic syndrome and risk of acute myocardial infarction a case-control study of 26,903 subjects from 52 countries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010,55(21):2390-8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jafari N, Kabir MJ, Motlagh ME: Death Registration System in I.R.Iran. Iranian J Publ Health 2009,38(Suppl 1):3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hill K, Lopez AD, Shibuya K, Jha P: Interim measures for meeting needs for health sector data: births, deaths, and causes of death. Lancet 2007, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Flaxman AD, Wang H, Levin-Rector A, Dwyer L, et al.: Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970-2010: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 4. Lancet 2010,375(9730):1988-2008. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60703-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Khosravi A, Rao C, Naghavi M, Taylor R, Jafari N, Lopez AD: Impact of misclassification on measures of cardiovascular disease mortality in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a cross-sectional study. Bull World Health Organ 2008,86(9):688-96. 10.2471/BLT.07.046532

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    King G, Honaker J, Joseph A, Scheve K: Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Review 2001,95(No 1):21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ: Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002,360(9343):1347-60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Coale A, Guo G: Revised regional model life tables at very low levels of mortality. Population Index 1989, 55: 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Preston SH, Heuveline P, Guillot M: Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. First edition. Oxford UK: Blackwell; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Filmer D, Pritchett LH: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 2001,38(1):18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Farzadfar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, Pelizzari PM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al.: National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3.0 million participants. Lancet 2011,377(9765):578-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62038-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, et al.: National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet 2011,377(9765):557-67. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lin JK, Singh GM, Paciorek CJ, Cowan MJ, et al.: National, regional, and global trends in systolic blood pressure since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 786 country-years and 5.4 million participants. Lancet 2011,377(9765):568-77. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62036-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez AD: The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. In PHE 82. Canberra: AIHW; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Norman R, Bradshaw D, Schneider M, Joubert J, Groenewald P, Lewin S, et al.: A comparative risk assessment for South Africa in 2000: Towards promoting health and preventing disease. SAMJ 2007,97(7):5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Stevens GA, Dias RH, Thomas KJA, Rivera JA, Carvalho N: Characterizing the epidemiological transition in Mexico: National and subnational burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. PLoS medicine 2008,5(6):.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang X, Patel A, Horibe H, Wu Z, Barzi F, Rodgers A, et al.: Cholesterol, coronary heart disease, and stroke in the Asia Pacific region. Int J Epidemiol 2003,32(4):563-72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al.: Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004,364(9438):937-52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al.: National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet 2011, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Samavat T: National health program for control and prevention of hypertension. Tehran: Ministry of Health; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ikeda N, Gakidou E, Hasegawa T, Murray CJ: Understanding the decline of mean systolic blood pressure in Japan: an analysis of pooled data from the National Nutrition Survey, 1986-2002. Bull World Health Organ 2008,86(12):978-88. 10.2471/BLT.07.050195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    He FJ, MacGregor GA: Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002,16(11):761-70. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001459

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ghassemi H, Harrison G, Mohammad K: An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public Health Nutr 2002,5(1A):149-55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Farzadfar F, Murray CJ, Gakidou E, Bossert T, Namdari H, Alikhani S, et al.: Can rural primary healthcare manage noncommunicable diseases and risk factors? Evaluation of the effect of Behvarz system on diabetes and hypertension management in Iran. Submitted manuscript 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Romon M, Lommez A, Tafflet M, Basdevant A, Oppert JM, Bresson JL, et al.: Downward trends in the prevalence of childhood overweight in the setting of 12-year school- and community-based programmes. Public Health Nutr 2009,12(10):1735-42. 10.1017/S1368980008004278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Iranian Center for Diseases Control for providing the NCDSS 2005 data and Kathie Dionisio for her comments on an early version of the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ezzati.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Designed the study: FF, GD, and ME. Analyzed the data: FF and GD. Wrote the first draft of the paper: FF and ME. Contributed to the writing of the paper: GD, HN, JR, JM, AK, SA, CJLM. Supervised the research:ME.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farzadfar, F., Danaei, G., Namdaritabar, H. et al. National and subnational mortality effects of metabolic risk factors and smoking in Iran: a comparative risk assessment. Popul Health Metrics 9, 55 (2011).

Download citation


  • Systolic Blood Pressure
  • Standard Deviation
  • Fast Plasma Glucose
  • Metabolic Risk Factor
  • Lung Cancer Mortality