Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Correction: The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts

Population Health Metrics volume 21, Article number: 11 (2023) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 25 July 2023

Correction: Population Health Metrics (2023) 21:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0


The original publication of this article contained an incorrect version of Fig. 1 which was missing the country labels. The revised figure is available in this correction article, and the original article is updated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differences in unadjusted, adjusted and previously published confidante abortion rates, by context

Full size image

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vital Strategies, 100 Broadway, 4th Floor, New York City, NY, 10005, USA

    Onikepe O. Owolabi

  2. Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York City, NY, 10038, USA

    Margaret Giorgio, Ellie Leong & Elizabeth Sully

Authors
  1. Onikepe O. Owolabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret Giorgio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ellie Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth Sully
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onikepe O. Owolabi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Owolabi, O.O., Giorgio, M., Leong, E. et al. Correction: The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts. Popul Health Metrics 21, 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00311-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00311-z

Population Health Metrics

ISSN: 1478-7954